Hinduism Course At University Of Houston Sparks Controversy

Photo: University of Houston

India-West News Desk

HOUSTON, TX – At a time when Indian Americans are increasingly sensitive to allegations of Hinduphobia in academia, a controversy has erupted at the University of Houston (UH) over a course titled Lived Hindu Religion. The course, taught by Professor Aaron Michael Ullrey, came under scrutiny after an Indian American student accused the university of promoting biased and misleading content about Hinduism and India’s political landscape.

Vasant Bhatt filed a formal complaint with the College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences, objecting to a syllabus statement that the term “Hindu” is a relatively recent concept not found in ancient scriptures. Bhatt alleged that Ullrey characterized Hinduism as a “political tool weaponized by Hindu nationalists” and a “system of oppression against minorities.” The professor also allegedly referred to Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi as a “Hindu fundamentalist,” further fueling outrage.

Bhatt claimed that his concerns were not adequately addressed by the university’s religious studies department. The controversy has gained traction within the Indian American community, which has long voiced concerns over negative portrayals of Hinduism in U.S. academic settings.

In response, the University of Houston issued a statement reaffirming its commitment to academic freedom while acknowledging the concerns raised. “The University of Houston values academic freedom, which includes allowing faculty to explore complex and sometimes challenging topics in their teaching,” said Shawn Lindsey, Senior Associate Vice President for Strategic Communications.

Professor Ullrey has defended his teaching, asserting that his statements were taken out of context and do not reflect the intent of the course. “The essence of this course’s methodology is to use descriptive anthropology rather than prescriptive theology,” he stated. “Throughout the course, my goal is to show the sophistication, rationality, and historical complexity of the many religions deemed Hindu throughout the history of South Asia.”

Ullrey clarified that he does not present Hinduism as a singular, static entity but rather explores its diverse interpretations over time. He cited a passage from his syllabus that describes Hinduism as “encompassing various spiritual paths, philosophies, rituals, and social structures.”

The university also defended its academic approach, stating that terms like “fundamentalism” are used as analytical tools across religious studies disciplines, not as value judgments. “Professors are encouraged to connect course content to current events when appropriate, as long as it is done in a balanced way that enhances understanding,” UH said in a statement.