Adani Challenges SEC Case As ‘Extraterritorial’ And Baseless

NEW YORK, NY-Emphasizing that the lawsuit brought by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) against him falls outside US jurisdiction and fails to establish any wrongdoing, billionaire industrialist Gautam Adani has moved a US court seeking dismissal of the securities fraud case.

Arguing that the case represents an impermissible extraterritorial application of US law and fails for lack of personal jurisdiction, Gautam Adani and his nephew Sagar Adani have asked a US court to dismiss the lawsuit.

The defendants are seeking dismissal of the case in full and said they are prepared to appear for a pre-motion conference if required. Denying all allegations, they, through their lawyers, filed a pre-motion letter ahead of a planned April 30 motion to dismiss in the Eastern District Court of New York.

In the pre-motion letter, Adani said the SEC’s claims over a 2021 bond sale by the group’s renewable energy arm, Adani Green Energy Ltd (AGEL), are “legally flawed” on multiple grounds.

They argued that the court lacks personal jurisdiction, stating that neither had sufficient contacts with the US or direct involvement in the bond offering.

The filing contended that the SEC’s case is impermissibly extraterritorial, noting that the securities were not listed in the US, the issuer is Indian, and the alleged misconduct occurred entirely in India.

In September 2021, AGEL conducted a $750 million bond offering pursuant to SEC Rule 144A and SEC Regulation S, which are registration exemptions for private resales to qualified institutional buyers (QIBs) and non-US sales.

AGEL sold these bonds outside the US through an agreement with non-US underwriters, who then resold the Notes to QIBs. A fraction of those resales is alleged to have been made to “investors in the United States”.

AGEL was not a party to these transactions, the lawyers said in the letter.

The grounds for dismissal also include the SEC’s failure to state a claim, with the defendants asserting that they are neither based in the US nor conduct activities there that would grant the court jurisdiction, and that the alleged actions involve non-US entities outside the scope of US law.

Even if the claims are accepted at face value, the complaint fails to establish any actionable legal violation or meet the threshold required to proceed. The cited statements are neither materially false nor misleading and, with no direct involvement in the offering, the defendants cannot be held liable, according to the letter.

Lawyers also stated that the SEC complaint does not allege that Gautam Adani approved the issuance, attended key meetings, or directed any activity at US investors.

Citing US Supreme Court precedent, the defendants said the SEC failed to show any “domestic transaction”, a requirement for applying US securities laws.

The filing further argues that statements cited by the SEC — relating to ESG commitments, anti-corruption practices, and corporate reputation — amount to non-actionable “puffery”, or general corporate optimism that investors cannot reasonably rely on.

The SEC has also failed to tie Sagar Adani to a single allegedly false or misleading statement, much less one directed at US investors, the letter added. (IANS)